Public Webinar: Pathways for advancing pesticide policies

Despite substantial efforts in the last decade, there is little evidence that Europe has achieved a reduction in pesticide risks and impacts mandated in National Action Plans. Upcoming agricultural policy reforms in Switzerland and other European countries as well as the recently launched “From Farm to Fork” strategy present an important opportunity to advance current pesticide policies.

In a recently published Nature Food article  ‘external pagePathways for advancing pesticide policies,’ a consortium of researchers suggest key steps to achieve a reduction in pesticide risks. For example, new technologies and regulatory frameworks need to be implemented and aligned with all actors in food value chains. The authors outline a holistic approach to advancing pesticide policies, which accounts for the major trade-offs and areas of tension with other agricultural policy goals.

In a public webinar, several authors of the article came together to discuss key challenges and present pathways for advancing European pesticide policies. In presentations and discussions, the panelists provided insights into selected areas such as best policy practices, new technological approaches, farmer behavior, and efficient policy designs.

The Webinar was co-hosted by the World Food System Center and the Agricultural Economics and Policy Group of ETH Zurich.

Date: 20 October 2020
Time: 11:00-12:30 CET
Location: Zoom Webinar

Program:

Webinar Video

A link to a recording of the webinar is available upon request to .

Nature Food Article

Read more from the panelists and others in international consortium on the topic of “Pathways for Advancing Pesticide Policies” in Nature Food article: external pagehttps://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-020-00141-4

Public Link: external pagehttps://www.nature.com/articles...

Follow up reading

Pedersen, A. B., Nielsen, H. Ø., & Daugbjerg, C. (2020). Environmental policy mixes and target group heterogeneity: analysing Danish farmers’ responses to the pesticide taxes. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1-​12. external pagehttps://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1806047

Finger, R., Möhring, N., Dalhaus, T., Böcker, T. (2017). Revisiting pesticide taxation schemes. Ecological Economics 134: 263–266. external pagehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.001

Kudsk, P., Jørgensen, L. N., & Ørum, J. E. (2018). Pesticide Load—A new Danish pesticide risk indicator with multiple applications. Land use policy, 70, 384-393. external pagehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.010

Möhring, N., Bozzola, M., Hirsch, S., Finger, R. (2020). Are pesticides risk decreasing? The relevance of pesticide indicator choice in empirical analysis. Agricultural Economics, 51(3), 429-444. external pagehttps://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12563

Möhring, N., Wuepper, D., Musa, T., Finger, R. (2020). Why farmers deviate from recommended pesticide timing: the role of uncertainty and information. Pest Management Science. external pagehttps://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5826

Maass, O.; Consmuller, N.; Kehlenbeck, H. (2019) Socioeconomic Impact of Genome Editing on Agricultural Value Chains: The Case of Fungal-Resistant and Coeliac-Safe Wheat. Sustainability, 11(22), 6421. external pagehttps://doi.org/10.3390/su11226421

Brookes, G.; Barfoot, P. GM crop technology use 1996-2018: farm income and production impacts. (2020) GM Crops & Food, 11(4). external pagehttps://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2020.1779574

Zukunftsblog

The quest for a holistic pesticide policy: Bans and simple measures alone won’t solve the problems in plant protection. Robert Finger presses for a comprehensive pesticide policy in the ETH Zukunftsblog: https://ethz.ch/en/news-and-events/eth-news/news/2020/10/blog-finger-pesticid-policy.html

JavaScript has been disabled in your browser